This set of rewrite is a bit difficult. For one thing, many of them are short sentences, leaving very little room to maneuver. Secondly, there are many quotes in them, and you cannot alter a quote.
Source: http://www.bilinguist.com/data/hy03/messages/130955.html#130981
jennylearnstowalk 于 2005/02/19 01:14:24 发表在 汉英03
and 作者(Author):Yeti - 2005/02/19 20:14:36 ***
Original text: #1. In a country that can argue endlessly about such royal minutiae as whether it is appropriate for the queen to keep her breakfast cereal in plastic containers, a backlash against the second marriage of Charles, the Prince of Wales, is well under way.
Rewritten by Jennylearnstowalk: #1(((Britain is a country where daily trifles of the royal family can be intriguing topics to its citizens; the one like whether it is appropriate for the queen to place her breakfast cereal in plastic containers can cause a marathon debate. A flood of criticism towards Prince Charles’ remarriage, as one might expect, is now sweeping across the country.)))
Rewritten byYeti: #I. Britain, a country where daily trifles of the royal family, such as whether the Queen should use plastic container to keep her breakfast cereal, is witnessing a growing tide of negative sentiment towards the remarriage of Charles, the Prince of Wales. }
--------------------------------------------
2. Whether the couple will win acceptance with their subjects remains to be seen. But one thing is certain: for Charles, it will not be anything like the first time.
J
/FONT>(((Will the altar-bound couple be accepted by the public? It is yet to be known. But one thing is for sure: For Charles, this time everything is so different.)))
Y: II : The jury is still out on whether this union will be accepted by the Public. For Charles, there is little doubt that the pomp will not be anywhere near the first time.
3. "Boring Old Gits to Wed" was how The Star announced the news last week- the other "old git" in the headline being Charles's fiancée, Camilla Parker Bowles. "What is there to celebrate?" asked Amanda Platell in The Daily Mail. "That a 56-year-old man has finally married his mistress?"
J
/FONT>(((Last week, Charles’ decision was taunted as “Boring Old Gits to wed” in the headline of The Star, with his fiancée Camilla Parker Bowles sharing the title of the other “old git”. Amanda Platell questioned in The Daily Mail, “What is there for us to be applauded? A 56-year-old man has finally fulfilled his wish of marrying his mistress?”)))
Y: III Last week, Charles and Camilla were taunted as “Boring old Gits” in the headline of the Star, and Amanda Platell of the Daily Mail openly questioned the need for celebrating a 56-year-old man marrying his mistress.}
--
4. Britons have various reasons for their misgivings about the wedding, which is to take place April 8. Some feel that Charles, who cheated on his first wife, Diana, with Mrs. Parker Bowles, does not deserve to live happily ever after with the woman they regard as the agent of Diana's distress. Others simply object on general principle to Mrs. Parker Bowles, who has long been cast as the wicked stepmother in the ruined royal fairy tale. Still others simply wish the royal family would go away and stop bothering everyone.
J
/FONT>(((Britons have many reasons to worry about the wedding to be held April 8. Some people think the relationship between Charles and Mrs. Parker shouldn’t be blessed for he was disloyal to Diana, his ex-wife, whose distress allegedly originated from his extra-martial affair with Mrs. Parker---the other woman. Others’ aversion to Mrs. Parker arises from their general belief as she has been portrayed as the wicked woman who sets eyes on that role after destroying the royal fairy tale. The rest are simply getting tired of this sort of event and wish to hear no more.)))
Y: IV : Britain is abounded with uneasiness about the April 8th wedding. Should Charles the adulterer be blessed with matrimonial bliss? Or, as a matter of principle, Camilla, the royal home wrecker, should never get her wish. Others have had enough of the royal family and wish they would just fade away.
5. "Why should these meaningless people be embedded in our national imagination?" wrote Polly Toynbee, a columnist with The Guardian. "Ludicrous and grotesque for the wretched royal performers and their subjects alike, this is the least dignified of all state institutions."
J
/FONT>(((Polly Toynbee, a columnist with The Guardian was not stingy with his bitter remarks, “Why should we let these people be the focus of our attention and go all the way to speculate everything that happened to them? This is weird and ridiculous with royal performers clowning around and their subjects being manic. This is completely undignified.”)))
Y: V: (I avoid using any direct quote until I got to the very end)
The Guardian columnist, Polly Tonybee, questioned about why Britons should be captivated by such frivolous bores , criticized them for the absurdity of their action and branded the royal family as : “ the least dignified of all state institutions”
6. At first the queen seemed almost giddy with joy, at least by her modest emotional standards. "We're very happy," her office said in a statement on the day the engagement was announced. But since then, the queen has appeared intent - if you believe the popular press - on controlling the wedding plans, even if it means overriding her son's wishes.
J
/FONT>(((In many tabloids, story goes like this: At the beginning the queen appeared overjoyed despite her modest way of expressing her feelings. “We’re very happy.” her office said in a statement released on the day the engagement was proclaimed. But soon after, the queen became fixated on the wedding plans, which might lead to trespass her son’s wishes. Only if you buy the story.)))
Y: VI: In many tabloids, an overjoyed queen was quoted in an immediate press release as saying: “We’re very happy.” Rumors has it that she is out to wrestle the control of the wedding plans from ( the hands of) her son.
7. In normal family weddings, the role of older-generation wedding irritant is rightfully claimed by the mother of the bride, who exercises her natural-born duty to challenge everything from the size of the guest list to the color of the trim on the bridesmaids' sashes. But this is not a normal family, and the queen - who is to be host at the reception, at Windsor Castle - outranks anyone she feels like outranking.
J
/FONT>(((As in an ordinary family, the mother of the bride has every right to pick on everything including the number of the guests as well as the bridemaids’apparel. But here we have a royal family. Windsor Castle is the place and the queen, the most predominant figure, is the host at the reception.)))
Y: VII: Unlike the mother of a bride in a normal/ordinary family who has the prerogative of determining whom to invite and what the bridal party should wear, the Queen, hostess of the reception at Windsor Castle, can override anyone’s decision as she so pleases. (I have a feeling I have certain grammatical inconsistencies somewhere in there.)
--
8. According to Trevor Kavanagh, The Sun's political editor and a man as knowledgeable as anyone when it comes to these matters (which isn't saying a lot), Elizabeth has nixed Charles's idea of having a romantic reception at "dozens of intimate candlelit round tables." Instead, The Sun reported, she wants a muted, stuffy dinner at "one long, formal rectangular table."
(((“She snuffed out Charles’s plan of giving a romantic candlelit reception dinner and decided to replace it with a silent boring one. The table as she emphasized, should be long, formal and rectangular.” wrote The Sun’s political editor Trevor Kavanagh, a man who is quite an expert in these matters.)))
VIII, as mentioned above, I would replace the "decided to replace...silent..." with "...planned on having a low key/subdued traditional long table dinner. "
*No further examples until I come up with fresh material. Meanwhile, 你若是有文章想把用来做改写例子,请留信息给我。我看看可否用。谢谢. During the holiday season (Pre-Christmas to after New Year) I will be quite busy, as most North American families are.
To see how others practice rewriting: http://www.rainlane.com/dispbbs.asp?boardID=8&ID=17580&page=1>>
[此贴子已经被作者于2005-12-20 11:52:45编辑过]